Clinical Papers

Welcome to our Clinical Papers section. These articles offer insights into the uses and benefits of minimally invasive approaches in the gynecology surgery field.

Campbell ES, Xiao H, Smith MK. Types of hysterectomy: Comparison of characteristics, Hospital costs, utilization and outcomes. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2003; 48(12): 943-49.
PubMed Link

Lenihan JP, Kovanda C, Cammarano C. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004; 190(6): 1714-20.
PubMed Link

Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005(1): CD003677.
Cochrane Link
PubMed Link

Sarmini OR, Lefholz K, Froeschke HP. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2005;12(2): 121-24.
PubMed Link

Warren L, Ladapo J, Borah B, Gunnarson C.  Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy:  analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.  Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2009; 16(5): 581-88.
PubMed Link



 
Select your country or region
 
  • © Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. 2010 - 2013.
  • DSL#12-9000
  • This site is published by Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. which is solely responsible for its contents and is intended for U.S. healthcare professionals only.
  • Last updated May 22, 2013. The third-party trademarks used herein are trademarks of their respective owners. Data and usage fees may apply. See your carrier for more information.